We use our own and third-party cookies and similar technologies to enhance and personalize your experience, analyze use of our website, and conduct marketing. For more information about these technologies, please see our Privacy Policy.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
Commentary: Challenges tribes face for federal recognition
Share this:
In March we explored the state and federal challenges faced by Louisiana’s Native American tribes in their quest for recognition. This month, we examine the federal recognition process, examining the steps involved and the significance of this status to tribal communities. Understanding this journey is crucial to tribes reclaiming their sovereignty and securing their future.
Federal recognition is a formal acknowledgment by the U.S. government of a tribe’s sovereign status, granting legal rights and access to federal assistance, impacting self-governance, cultural heritage protection, and member services. Administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) through the Office of Federal Acknowledgment (OFA), the process requires tribes to prove historical continuity, social cohesion, political influence, that they have a governing document, and show descent from a historical tribe, without having been previously terminated by Congress.
The process begins with submitting a letter of intent to the OFA, followed by extensive documentation. The OFA reviews the application, often requiring additional information. A proposed finding is issued, then opened for public comment, followed by a final determination. If the decision is unfavorable, tribes can appeal or seek recognition through congressional legislation.
The criteria for recognition require tribes to provide detailed historical and genealogical records, which can be difficult to gather, especially if records are scarce or incomplete. The process demands significant financial and legal resources, including historians, genealogists, and legal experts, and is influenced by political pressures and external factors, making it seem biased or unfair. Historical displacement and disruption due to colonization and federal policies also can fragment communities and disrupt governance structures, complicating the process.
Federal recognition also gains tribes access to crucial federal funding and services for healthcare, education, housing, and economic development, and grants legal standing to manage lands, resources, and exercise sovereign rights, including establishing courts and law enforcement agencies. For example, the Pamunkey Indian Tribe in Virginia, which received federal recognition in 2016 after a 35-year struggle, has been able to pursue economic development opportunities and strengthen its cultural heritage.
Some tribes seek recognition through congressional legislation, a potentially quicker path that requires substantial political support and strategic lobbying. The process begins with compiling historical, genealogical, and anthropological evidence. The tribe then engages in lobbying efforts, building relationships with key legislators and forming alliances with other tribes, organizations, and advocacy groups. With the assistance of congressional staff or legal experts, a bill is drafted outlining the tribe’s history, cultural significance, and justification for recognition. The tribe identifies a sponsor, seeks co-sponsors for broad support, and the bill is formally introduced to either the House or Senate, assigned a bill number, and referred to the appropriate committee.
The committee reviews the bill and may hold hearings where tribal stakeholders provide testimony and evidence in support of the bill. If the committee approves the bill, it moves to the floor of the House or Senate for debate. If the bill passes both chambers, it is sent to the President for signature.
Several tribes have successfully gained federal recognition through congressional legislation. For example, the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe was recognized in 2007 through the Mashpee Wampanoag Tribe Recognition Act after a long struggle involving both administrative and legislative efforts.
As we continue to advocate for a more accessible and equitable recognition process, it is essential to honor the perseverance of tribes and support their efforts to reclaim their heritage and secure a prosperous future for their communities.
For more of Brandi Liberty’s columns on Native American communities, click here.
Related
Most Read Stories
Recent Stories
Bringing them home: Eva Baham’s search for the stolen 19
Freedom Rider Julia Humbles challenged the rules of segregation
UMC nurses rally against move to terminate prominent union organizer
Supreme Court to hear appeal from Chevron in landmark Louisiana coastal damage lawsuits
Republish our articles for free, online or in print, under a Creative Commons license.
Brandi Liberty
Brandi Liberty is an enrolled member of the Iowa Tribe of Kansas & Nebraska and a descendant of the United Houma Nation in Southern Louisiana. She is the owner of The Luak Group and its subsidiary... More by Brandi Liberty